COMMENTARY: The lines between a sinful act and a state of sin have been blurred. It’s time to clarify them.
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER
In recent moral teaching, it has become clear that the gravity of a person living in sin — of being in a state of sin — has been eclipsed by poor theology, wishful thinking and naïve pastoral practice. Whether we’re discussing Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried, or the blessing of same-sex couples, or the tacit approval of cohabitating couples, we need to retrieve and emphasize the terminal nature of states of sin.
As a Church, we need to expose the spiritual severity of states of sin and assist in leading those within them to repentance in Jesus Christ.
The reality of states of sin is far more egregious than the hygienic term “irregular unions.” In the case of a state of sin, the canonical term “irregular union” doesn’t fully summarize the peril of the souls involved, and so we must defer to the moral tradition of the Church and use the term “state of sin.” We must emphasize where a person is in his or her relationship with Jesus Christ and how he or she can reconcile with him.
A state of sin is different from a sinful act, even a mortal sin. It is sometimes asked why the Church will forgive and welcome to Holy Communion someone who has had an abortion but will not forgive someone who is divorced and remarried. The question reflects the current lack of awareness about states of sin. It shows a blurring of important moral distinctions. Ultimately, the question begs for a clarification between a sinful act and a state of sin.
The difference between someone who has had an abortion (or been an accomplice to it) and a person who is divorced and remarried is found in the person’s willingness to sacramentally confess his sins and make a firm resolution of amendment. It is the resolution of amendment, which is essential to the sacrament of confession, that leads a person to further conversion and reconciliation with the Lord Jesus.
For the person who has had an abortion, there was a severely sinful act committed in the past. It’s not a progressive action, meaning it’s not ongoing. It was a singular action and not an enduring way of life. Someone could repent of such a sinful action because it’s over.
By contrast, someone who is divorced and remarried is living in a sinful state of life.
According to the teachings of the Lord Jesus, the presumed marriage of a person who is divorced and remarried is an ongoing state of adultery:
“It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that anyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery” (Matthew 5:31-32; also found in Luke 16:18).
The irregular marriage cannot be repented of while the person is still in the midst of the sinful way of life. Unless a person is ready to change his state of life, such as separating from his supposed spouse (or living as “brother and sister” for the sake of any children), the person is living in sin and cannot receive the mercy offered by God since reconciliation is not possible.
Such a condition is also true for those living in a same-sex relationship and those who are cohabitating.
A state of sin contradicts the Gospel. In no way could it be argued that a state of sin is somehow within moral truth and the teachings of Jesus Christ. In a state of sin, such as the presumed marriage of divorced-and-remarried people, or the attempted marriage of same-sex people, or the very act of cohabitating by a couple, the sin is the state of affairs and the relationship itself. The sin is not merely an act, but the person’s way of life.
In the classic British novel Brideshead Revisited, author Evelyn Waugh presents us with the harrowing dilemma of Lady Julia Flyte. The young woman was prepared to marry Rex, a materialistic man who agreed to convert to Catholicism to marry her. It was discovered, however, that Rex was a divorced man and unable to marry another woman.
In opposition to the tenets of the Catholic faith, which she learned as a child, Julia decides to marry Rex anyway. Julia further enters into an affair with Charles, the protagonist whose journey of faith is at the center of the novel.
While speaking to Charles at night by the fountain of her family’s estate, a mood filled with water and an absence of light, Julia undergoes a dark night of her soul. The woman knows of the iniquity of living in sin. She tells her illicit lover:
