Former Harvard president Claudine Gay speaks out about her resignation in New York Times op-ed

Claudine Gay said she resigned as Harvard president to “deny demagogues the opportunity” to use her in their campaign to undermine the university’s mission.

CBS NEWS

A day after announcing her resignation as president of Harvard University, Claudine Gay wrote an op-ed for The New York Times defending her tenure.

Gay said she stepped down from her position on Tuesday, just six months in the role, to stop political “demagogues” from using her in an attempt to undermine the university and the values it stands for. 

“My hope is that by stepping down I will deny demagogues the opportunity to further weaponize my presidency in their campaign to undermine the ideals animating Harvard since its founding: excellence, openness, independence, truth,” she wrote. 

Gay had come under sharp public scrutiny over her handling of antisemitism on campus since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, as well as accusations of plagiarism in some of her past academic writings. Republicans, led by GOP conference chair Rep. Elise Stefanik, called for her resignation after Gay and the presidents of Penn and MIT testified before a House committee last month.

Gay said she fell into a “well-laid trap” when she testified about how she handled antisemitic incidents on campus since Hamas’ attack on Israel. 

“Yes, I made mistakes,” she wrote. “In my initial response to the atrocities of Oct. 7, I should have stated more forcefully what all people of good conscience know: Hamas is a terrorist organization that seeks to eradicate the Jewish state.”

At the hearing, she continued, “I fell into a well-laid trap. I neglected to clearly articulate that calls for the genocide of Jewish people are abhorrent and unacceptable and that I would use every tool at my disposal to protect students from that kind of hate.”

She went on to address the accusations of plagiarism.

“Most recently, the attacks have focused on my scholarship,” she wrote. “My critics found instances in my academic writings where some material duplicated other scholars’ language, without proper attribution. I believe all scholars deserve full and appropriate credit for their work.”